Which storage solution meets these requirements?
Configure Amazon S3 to store the users’ home directories. Join Amazon S3 to Active Directory.
Configure a Multi-AZ file system with Amazon FSx for Windows File Server. Join Amazon FSx to Active Directory.
Configure Amazon Elastic File System (Amazon EFS) for the users’ home directories. Configure AWS Single Sign-On with Active Directory.
Configure Amazon Elastic Block Store (Amazon EBS) to store the users’ home directories. Configure AWS Single Sign-On with Active Directory.
Explanations:
Amazon S3 is an object storage service and does not provide file-level access, which is necessary for home directories. S3 cannot be directly joined to Active Directory for access control purposes.
Amazon FSx for Windows File Server is a fully managed native Windows file system that supports Active Directory integration, providing fault tolerance, file-level backup and recovery, and access control based on AD. Multi-AZ configurations enhance availability and durability.
Amazon EFS is a managed file storage service that supports NFS but does not directly support Windows file shares or Active Directory for access control. EFS is primarily suited for Linux workloads.
Amazon EBS provides block storage and is not suitable for storing user home directories in a multi-user environment. It also lacks native support for Active Directory integration and file-level backup without additional configuration.
I evaluate that the answer is:
Configure a Multi-AZ file system with Amazon FSx for Windows File Server. Join Amazon FSx to Active Directory.
I figure that the answer is:
Configure a Multi-AZ file system with Amazon FSx for Windows File Server. Join Amazon FSx to Active Directory.