Which solution will meet these requirements with the LEAST operational overhead?

By:
In: SAA-C03
Tagged:
With: 2 Comments
A company wants to migrate its three-tier application from on premises to AWS.The web tier and the application tier are running on third-party virtual machines (VMs).The database tier is running on MySQL.The company needs to migrate the application by making the fewest possible changes to the architecture.The company also needs a database solution that can restore data to a specific point in time.

Which solution will meet these requirements with the LEAST operational overhead?

Migrate the web tier and the application tier to Amazon EC2 instances in private subnets. Migrate the database tier to Amazon RDS for MySQL in private subnets.

Migrate the web tier to Amazon EC2 instances in public subnets. Migrate the application tier to EC2 instances in private subnets. Migrate the database tier to Amazon Aurora MySQL in private subnets.

Migrate the web tier to Amazon EC2 instances in public subnets. Migrate the application tier to EC2 instances in private subnets. Migrate the database tier to Amazon RDS for MySQL in private subnets.

Migrate the web tier and the application tier to Amazon EC2 instances in public subnets. Migrate the database tier to Amazon Aurora MySQL in public subnets.

2026-03-15

2 Comments

  1. Roger
    Author

    If I’m correct, the answer is:
    Migrate the web tier to Amazon EC2 instances in public subnets. Migrate the application tier to EC2 instances in private subnets. Migrate the database tier to Amazon Aurora MySQL in private subnets.

  2. Mark
    Author

    I suspect that the answer is:
    Migrate the web tier to Amazon EC2 instances in public subnets. Migrate the application tier to EC2 instances in private subnets. Migrate the database tier to Amazon Aurora MySQL in private subnets.

Leave a Reply to Mark Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

2 + 18 =