Which solution will meet these requirements with the LEAST latency?
(Choose two.)
Deploy compute optimized EC2 instances into a cluster placement group.
Deploy compute optimized EC2 instances into a partition placement group.
Attach the EC2 instances to an Amazon FSx for Lustre file system.
Attach the EC2 instances to an Amazon FSx for OpenZFS file system.
Attach the EC2 instances to an Amazon FSx for NetApp ONTAP file system.
Explanations:
EC2 instances deployed in a cluster placement group are optimized for low-latency communication between instances, which is ideal for latency-sensitive HPC workloads.
Partition placement groups provide fault tolerance and are better for workloads that require high availability and spread across partitions, not for low-latency performance.
Amazon FSx for Lustre is optimized for high-performance computing (HPC) but does not support SMB, which is required for multi-protocol access (NFS and SMB).
Amazon FSx for OpenZFS does not support SMB or NFS multi-protocol access, so it does not meet the requirement for multi-protocol access.
Amazon FSx for NetApp ONTAP supports both NFS and SMB multi-protocol access and provides a managed, low-latency solution suitable for the migration of storage workloads.
I calculate that the answer is:
Deploy compute optimized EC2 instances into a cluster placement group.
I rate that the answer is:
Deploy compute optimized EC2 instances into a cluster placement group.