Which solution will meet these requirements?
Add an execution role to the function with lambda:InvokeFunction as the action and * as the principal.
Add an execution role to the function with lambda:InvokeFunction as the action and Service:amazonaws.com as the principal.
Add a resource-based policy to the function with lambda:’* as the action and Service:events.amazonaws.com as the principal.
Add a resource-based policy to the function with lambda:InvokeFunction as the action and Service:events.amazonaws.com as the principal.
Explanations:
This option incorrectly uses*as the principal, which allows any principal to invoke the Lambda function. This violates the principle of least privilege, as it grants permissions too broadly.
This option specifiesService:amazonaws.comas the principal, which is not a valid principal for Lambda function invocation. This will not effectively restrict access to EventBridge.
This option allows all actions (lambda:*) instead of specificallylambda:InvokeFunction. This grants more permissions than necessary, violating the principle of least privilege.
This option correctly specifieslambda:InvokeFunctionas the action andService:events.amazonaws.comas the principal, allowing only EventBridge to invoke the function. This adheres to the principle of least privilege by limiting access to only what is necessary.
My best guess is:
Add a resource-based policy to the function with lambda:InvokeFunction as the action and Service:events.amazonaws.com as the principal.
I plan that the answer is:
Add a resource-based policy to the function with lambda:InvokeFunction as the action and Service:events.amazonaws.com as the principal.