Which solution meets these requirements?

By:
In: SAA-C02
Tagged:
With: 2 Comments
A company wants to deploy a shared file system for its .NET application servers and Microsoft SQL Server databases running on Amazon EC2 instances withWindows Server 2016.The solution must be able to be integrated into the corporate Active Directory domain, be highly durable, be managed by AWS, and provide high levels of throughput and IOPS.

Which solution meets these requirements?

Use Amazon FSx for Windows File Server.

Use Amazon Elastic File System (Amazon EFS).

Use AWS Storage Gateway in file gateway mode.

Deploy a Windows file server on two On Demand instances across two Availability Zones.

Explanations:

Amazon FSx for Windows File Server is designed for Windows environments, integrates with Active Directory, and offers high durability, throughput, and IOPS. It’s a fully managed service that supports SMB file shares.

Amazon Elastic File System (EFS) is a scalable file storage service for use with AWS Cloud services and on-premises resources. However, it is not specifically designed for Windows environments and does not integrate with Active Directory.

AWS Storage Gateway in file gateway mode allows on-premises applications to use cloud storage, but it is not a native file system for Windows and does not provide the same level of integration with Active Directory as FSx.

Deploying a Windows file server on EC2 instances requires manual management, lacks the built-in durability and high availability of managed services, and does not inherently integrate with Active Directory without additional configuration.

2026-04-08

2 Comments

  1. Brittany
    Author

    I deduce that the answer is:
    Use Amazon FSx for Windows File Server.

  2. Patricia
    Author

    I assess that the answer is:
    Use Amazon FSx for Windows File Server.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

14 − eight =