Which combination of actions should a solutions architect take to meet these requirements?
(Choose two.)
Mount Amazon S3 as a file system to the on-premises servers.
Deploy an AWS Storage Gateway file gateway to replace NFS storage.
Deploy AWS Snowball Edge to provision NFS mounts to on-premises servers.
Deploy an AWS Storage Gateway volume gateway to replace the block storage.
Deploy Amazon Elastic File System (Amazon EFS) volumes and mount them to on-premises servers.
Explanations:
Amazon S3 cannot be directly mounted as a file system, and it does not support block or NFS storage, which is needed by the applications.
AWS Storage Gateway file gateway can provide NFS-compatible storage, allowing the company to extend on-premises storage without application re-architecture.
AWS Snowball Edge is designed for data transfer and temporary storage, not for ongoing storage with high-performance local caching for applications.
AWS Storage Gateway volume gateway provides block storage with caching capabilities, allowing the company to extend storage capacity without re-architecting.
Amazon EFS is a cloud-native solution that requires AWS resources; it is not suitable for on-premises environments with local caching needs.
It seems to me that the answer is:
Deploy an AWS Storage Gateway file gateway to replace NFS storage.
I think the answer is:
Deploy an AWS Storage Gateway file gateway to replace NFS storage.