Which solution will meet these requirements?
Update the Auto Scaling group to use the AZ2 subnet only. Delete and re-create the AZ1 subnet using half the previous address space. Adjust the Auto Scaling group to also use the new AZ1 subnet. When the instances are healthy, adjust the Auto Scaling group to use the AZ1 subnet only. Remove the current AZ2 subnet. Create a new AZ2 subnet using the second half of the address space from the original AZ1 subnet. Create a new AZ3 subnet using half the original AZ2 subnet address space, then update the Auto Scaling group to target all three new subnets.
Terminate the EC2 instances in the AZ1 subnet. Delete and re-create the AZ1 subnet using half the address space. Update the Auto Scaling group to use this new subnet. Repeat this for the second AZ. Define a new subnet in AZ3, then update the Auto Scaling group to target all three new subnets.
Create a new VPC with the same IPv4 address space and define three subnets, with one for each AZ. Update the existing Auto Scaling group to target the new subnets in the new VPC.
Update the Auto Scaling group to use the AZ2 subnet only. Update the AZ1 subnet to have the previous address space. Adjust the Auto Scaling group to also use the AZ1 subnet again. When the instances are healthy, adjust the Auto Scaling group to use the AZ1 subnet only. Update the current AZ2 subnet and assign the second half of the address space from the original AZ1 subnet. Create a new AZ3 subnet using half the original AZ2 subnet address space, then update the Auto Scaling group to target all three new subnets.
Explanations:
This solution achieves the goal of splitting the original subnets into smaller subnets across all AZs. By reallocating address space from the original two subnets and updating the Auto Scaling group to gradually target the new subnets, it provides seamless expansion without interrupting service or requiring additional IP space.
Terminating instances in AZ1 immediately causes service disruption, which does not meet the requirement for uninterrupted connectivity. This approach also risks loss of high availability during the transition process.
Creating a new VPC with the same CIDR block is not feasible, as CIDR blocks must be unique across VPCs in the same account and Region. This option also would cause connectivity interruptions with the on-premises environment.
This option suggests modifying the original AZ1 subnet address space, which would result in service disruption. This approach does not meet the requirement for uninterrupted connectivity and could lead to IP conflicts during reconfiguration.