Which solution will meet these requirements?
Use Amazon Textract for automatic processing. Use Amazon A2I with Amazon Mechanical Turk for manual review.
Use Amazon Rekognition for automatic processing. Use Amazon A2I with a private workforce option for manual review.
Use Amazon Transcribe for automatic processing. Use Amazon A2I with a private workforce option for manual review.
Use AWS Panorama for automatic processing. Use Amazon A2I with Amazon Mechanical Turk for manual review.
Explanations:
Amazon Textract is designed for extracting text from documents and does not apply to image defect detection for plaques. It does not provide the necessary image analysis for identifying defects. Additionally, Amazon Mechanical Turk is not the preferred option for manual review in this context since Amazon A2I supports a private workforce, which is often more efficient for internal quality control processes.
Amazon Rekognition is an image and video analysis service that can identify objects, people, text, scenes, and activities, making it suitable for detecting defects in plaque images. It can classify images against the S3 bucket of defect images. Using Amazon A2I with a private workforce allows the internal team to efficiently manage low-confidence predictions, ensuring a controlled and familiar review process.
Amazon Transcribe is used for converting speech to text and is not applicable for processing images to detect defects. Therefore, it cannot automate the quality control process for plaques. Like option A, it does not align with the requirements of image analysis and defect identification.
AWS Panorama is a service that provides computer vision capabilities at the edge and is typically used for video processing and real-time analytics. It is not designed specifically for defect detection in still images of plaques. Using Amazon Mechanical Turk for manual review is also less optimal than using a private workforce with Amazon A2I in this scenario.