Which solution meets these requirements?

By:
In: DBS-C01
Tagged:
With: 1 Comment
A large gaming company is creating a centralized solution to store player session state for multiple online games.The workload required key-value storage with low latency and will be an equal mix of reads and writes.Data should be written into the AWS Region closest to the user across the games’ geographically distributed user base.The architecture should minimize the amount of overhead required to manage the replication of data between Regions.

Which solution meets these requirements?

Amazon RDS for MySQL with multi-Region read replicas

Amazon Aurora global database

Amazon RDS for Oracle with GoldenGate

Amazon DynamoDB global tables

Explanations:

Amazon RDS for MySQL with multi-Region read replicas does not meet the low-latency, equal read-write workload requirements as it is optimized for read-heavy workloads and involves more management overhead for cross-region replication.

Amazon Aurora global database is designed for low-latency read and write operations across multiple regions but requires higher management overhead than DynamoDB and doesn’t specifically optimize for key-value workloads.

Amazon RDS for Oracle with GoldenGate is a complex solution mainly for database replication and not ideal for key-value storage with low-latency writes across multiple regions.

Amazon DynamoDB global tables provide low-latency, multi-region replication with seamless management for key-value data, making it ideal for a globally distributed, equal read/write workload.

2025-10-12

1 Comment

  1. Peter
    Author

    I organize that the answer is:
    Amazon DynamoDB global tables

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

two + fifteen =