Which pipeline option will reduce S3 bucket sprawl alerts?
Combine the multiple separate code repositories into a single one, and deploy using an AWS CodePipeline that has logic for each project.
Create new pipelines by using the AWS API or AWS CLI, and configure them to use a single S3 bucket with separate prefixes for each project.
Create a new pipeline in a different region for each project to bypass the service limits for S3 buckets in a single region.
Create a new pipeline and S3 bucket for each project by using the AWS API or AWS CLI to bypass the service limits for S3 buckets in a single account.
Explanations:
Combining multiple repositories into a single one may simplify management but will not address the issue of S3 bucket sprawl or service limit alerts. It could lead to other complexities in deployment and maintenance, particularly if projects have different requirements.
By creating new pipelines that use a single S3 bucket with separate prefixes for each project, you effectively reduce the number of S3 buckets needed, thus mitigating the risk of hitting service limits related to S3 buckets. This approach maintains project separation while optimizing resource use.
Creating a new pipeline in a different region for each project would not solve the problem of S3 bucket limits in the current region and could complicate resource management and deployment. It also introduces latency and cross-region data transfer costs.
While creating a new pipeline and S3 bucket for each project bypasses service limits, it exacerbates the issue of S3 bucket sprawl and could lead to future service limit alerts, negating the goal of minimizing resource usage and complexity in management.
I sort that the answer is:
Create new pipelines by using the AWS API or AWS CLI, and configure them to use a single S3 bucket with separate prefixes for each project.