When the new S3 bucket is put into production, the upload performance from certain geographic areas is lower than the upload performance that the existing $3 buckets provideWhat should the SysOps administrator do to remediate this issue?
Provision an Amazon ElastiCache for Redis cluster for the new S3 bucket. Provide the developers with the configuration endpoint of the cluster for use in their API calls
Add the new S3 bucket to a new Amazon CloudFront distribution. Provide the developers with the domain name of the new distribution for use in their API calls.
Enable S3 Transfer Acceleration for the new S3 bucket. Verify that the developers are using the DOC-EXAMPLE-BUCKET.s3-accelerate.amazonaws.com endpoint name in their API calls.
Use S3 multipart upload for the new S3 bucket. Verify that the developers are using Region-specific S3 endpoint names such as DOC-EXAMPLE-BUCKETS3, [Region] amazonaws.com in their API calls.
Explanations:
ElastiCache for Redis is a caching service, but it does not directly improve the upload performance of S3 buckets. It is not suited for optimizing file upload speeds.
CloudFront is a content delivery network (CDN) that speeds up content delivery to users, but it is not designed for improving S3 upload speeds. It is more suitable for read-heavy operations, not for uploads.
S3 Transfer Acceleration uses Amazon CloudFront’s global network of edge locations to accelerate uploads to S3, especially from geographically distant locations. This improves upload performance for users worldwide.
Multipart upload improves the efficiency of uploading large files, but it does not address the specific issue of lower upload performance from certain geographic areas. Region-specific endpoints are also not a solution to global upload speed issues.
I conclude that the answer is:
Enable S3 Transfer Acceleration for the new S3 bucket. Verify that the developers are using the DOC-EXAMPLE-BUCKET.s3-accelerate.amazonaws.com endpoint name in their API calls.