Which solution will meet these requirements MOST cost-effectively?

By:
In: SAA-C03
Tagged:
With: 1 Comment
An online gaming company is transitioning user data storage to Amazon DynamoDB to support the company’s growing user base.The current architecture includes DynamoDB tables that contain user profiles, achievements, and in-game transactions.The company needs to design a robust, continuously available, and resilient DynamoDB architecture to maintain a seamless gaming experience for users.

Which solution will meet these requirements MOST cost-effectively?

Create DynamoDB tables in a single AWS Region. Use on-demand capacity mode. Use global tables to replicate data across multiple Regions.

Use DynamoDB Accelerator (DAX) to cache frequently accessed data. Deploy tables in a single AWS Region and enable auto scaling. Configure Cross-Region Replication manually to additional Regions.

Create DynamoDB tables in multiple AWS Regions. Use on-demand capacity mode. Use DynamoDB Streams for Cross-Region Replication between Regions.

Use DynamoDB global tables for automatic multi-Region replication. Deploy tables in multiple AWS Regions. Use provisioned capacity mode. Enable auto scaling.

Explanations:

While creating DynamoDB tables in a single region and using global tables for replication would provide multi-region data availability, it does not offer the most cost-effective solution because it relies on on-demand capacity mode which can lead to higher costs with fluctuating traffic.

This option suggests using DAX for caching, which can improve performance but does not inherently provide multi-region availability. Additionally, manually configuring Cross-Region Replication increases complexity and potential for errors, making it less cost-effective compared to automated solutions.

Creating tables in multiple regions using on-demand capacity mode offers resilience but lacks the automation and cost-efficiency of global tables. Cross-Region Replication via DynamoDB Streams is also more complex and potentially more costly than global tables.

Using DynamoDB global tables allows for automatic multi-Region replication, ensuring high availability and resilience. Deploying tables in multiple regions with provisioned capacity mode and enabling auto scaling strikes a balance between performance and cost, making it the most efficient solution.

2025-10-15

1 Comment

  1. Carl
    Author

    If I’m not mistaken, the answer is:
    Use DynamoDB global tables for automatic multi-Region replication. Deploy tables in multiple AWS Regions. Use provisioned capacity mode. Enable auto scaling.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

4 × 3 =