Which combination of changes will meet these requirements with the LEAST operational overhead?
(Choose two.)
Configure Amazon CloudFront in front of the website to use HTTPS functionality.
Deploy an AWS WAF web ACL in front of the website to provide HTTPS functionality.
Create and deploy an AWS Lambda function to manage and serve the website content.
Create the new website and an Amazon S3 bucket. Deploy the website on the S3 bucket with static website hosting enabled.
Create the new website. Deploy the website by using an Auto Scaling group of Amazon EC2 instances behind an Application Load Balancer.
Explanations:
Configuring Amazon CloudFront to use HTTPS provides secure content delivery with low latency and caching, which enhances performance while requiring minimal operational overhead.
AWS WAF is a web application firewall that protects applications from common web exploits, but it does not provide HTTPS functionality on its own. It requires a separate setup for secure connections.
Deploying an AWS Lambda function to manage and serve the website content introduces unnecessary complexity for a static website, as Lambda is not required for serving static content and adds operational overhead.
Deploying the website on an Amazon S3 bucket with static website hosting is a low-maintenance solution for a static site. It offers high scalability, durability, and security, with minimal operational overhead.
Using an Auto Scaling group of Amazon EC2 instances adds significant operational overhead for a static site. It is not necessary for serving static content, which can be efficiently managed through S3.
I figure that the answer is:
Configure Amazon CloudFront in front of the website to use HTTPS functionality.
As far as I can tell, the answer is:
Configure Amazon CloudFront in front of the website to use HTTPS functionality.